<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A&#38;L Enterprises Tech Line &#187; Recommendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anlenterprises.com/category/recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anlenterprises.com</link>
	<description>Andrew Explores Technology with you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://anlenterprises.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter/Facebook Client Recommendation: Seesmic Desktop</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/15/twitterfacebook-client-recommendation-seesmic-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/15/twitterfacebook-client-recommendation-seesmic-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally have a good recommendation for a Twitter/Facebook Client: Seemsmic Desktop.  I&#8217;ve tested Tweetdeck, Hootsuite and Seesmic and found they all have good features.  For me the Seesmic Desktop had the set of functions I needed to be effective: I needed access to the following. 2 Twitter Accounts Personal Facebook Account Multiple Facebook FAN [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally have a good recommendation for a Twitter/Facebook Client: <a href="http://seesmic.com/" target="_blank">Seemsmic</a> Desktop.  I&#8217;ve tested <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/" target="_blank">Tweetdeck</a>, <a href="http://hootsuite.com" target="_blank">Hootsuite</a> and Seesmic and found they all have good features.  For me the Seesmic Desktop had the set of functions I needed to be effective:</p>
<ol>
<li>I needed access to the following.
<ul>
<li>2 Twitter Accounts</li>
<li>Personal Facebook Account</li>
<li>Multiple Facebook FAN pages<span id="more-568"></span></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>I wanted the ability to have a combined view of all these accounts &#8211; so I don&#8217;t have to switch panes, etc.</li>
<li>I wanted the ability to view comments/add comments in the client.</li>
<li>I would have liked to have my LinkedIn account also tied in &#8211; but I noticed all I got was this person connected to this person &#8211; which wasn&#8217;t very meaningful to me.</li>
<li>I would like to have Google Buzz tied in &#8211; but I don&#8217;t think any of the clients support this yet.</li>
</ol>
<p>So here&#8217;s my personal strategy:</p>
<ol>
<li>I will have Seesmic client open &#8211; which consolidates all of my feeds into one timeline panel.  It won&#8217;t display the updates like Tweetdeck (which I liked) but I can scroll down the list to where I left off &#8211; or if I&#8217;m logged in does provide a discreet notification.</li>
<li>I post most of my content via this blog &#8211; which takes care of my main twitter account and Facebook FAN page. I use ping.fm to do the push and LinkedIn is connected based on a tag in the post.</li>
<li>For my secondary Twitter/Facebook FAN page I&#8217;m creating a &#8220;page&#8221; on this site and manually posting it to Facebook &#8211; which pushes it to Twitter.</li>
<li>For my groups on LinkedIn I think the weekly notifications are a prompt to login and interact with others.</li>
<li>For the Google Buzz experiment I&#8217;m just manually posting a link to these &#8211; I&#8217;m still not sure about Google Buzz as the default view of all comments expanded is driving me crazy.</li>
</ol>
<p>Comments about Tweetdeck:</p>
<ol>
<li>I was actually using Tweetdeck for some time and quite happy with it.  I liked the pop-up notifications and the overall GUI.</li>
<li>Unfortunately when I built a 2nd Twitter account it didn&#8217;t flow well as I couldn&#8217;t configure it well.</li>
<li>I think I also noticed that the &#8220;tweet&#8221; notification sound was occurring on my wife&#8217;s login &#8211; which was kind of annoying</li>
</ol>
<p>Comments about Hootsuite:</p>
<ol>
<li>I don&#8217;t have as much experience with this one as the others.</li>
<li>One of the key differences of this tool is that it exists totally in the browser &#8211; as opposed to a desktop client</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/15/twitterfacebook-client-recommendation-seesmic-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Recommendation: Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/06/browser-recommendation-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/06/browser-recommendation-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a long time I was a pretty regular IE user &#8211; never really paying much attention to Firefox or other browsers.  I was impressed with tabs in IE &#8211; as this is a great usability feature.  Most everything I needed to do worked fine in IE &#8211; and it was very dominant in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time I was a pretty regular IE user &#8211; never really paying much attention to Firefox or other browsers.  I was impressed with tabs in IE &#8211; as this is a great usability feature.  Most everything I needed to do worked fine in IE &#8211; and it was very dominant in the market share.  Then I started to have problems &#8211; when IE would try to restore the tabs after a reboot (which we know doesn&#8217;t happen very often with windows) and would seem to crash.  It seemed to get less and less stable over time&#8230;</p>
<p>Sometime last year I finally made the plunge and tried Firefox.  I was quite impressed with Firefox &#8211; especially with it&#8217;s support for more standards (like curved borders!!) and the extensions.  It&#8217;s just neat to be able to apply a theme to the browser so it looks cooler.</p>
<p>Recently I decided to try out Google Chrome as I had heard a lot about it too. <span id="more-543"></span> I find myself really liking Google Chrome &#8211; as it seems to work very well.  While I haven&#8217;t measured it &#8211; it seems to use less resources than Firefox does &#8211; and it has some nice features.  I like how the the downloads work &#8211; with a bar at the bottom appearing to show the progress and the recent downloads.  The status bar only appears when it&#8217;s needed.   You can right-click on a page and it will give you a print option,  search Google on that word, etc.  What I also like about Chrome (or Firefox) is that they have built-in spell checking.</p>
<p>So I narrowly recommend Chrome over Firefox &#8211; more for it&#8217;s efficiency.  They are both better browsers than IE &#8211; offering better standards compliance (web pages work better) and great extensions.  If you are still using IE (Internet Explorer) I would encourage you to try out Firefox or Chrome:</p>
<ul>
<li>Firefox: <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/">http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/</a> (open source from Mozilla Foundation)</li>
<li>Google Chrome: <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">http://www.google.com/chrome</a> (open source &#8211; version built by Google)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/02/06/browser-recommendation-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommendation: Upgrade Vista to Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/22/recommendation-upgrade-vista-to-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/22/recommendation-upgrade-vista-to-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was talking to some people this morning and I recommended they upgrade any Vista Computers they have from Windows Vista to Windows 7.  To me Windows 7 is like Vista the way it was supposed to be.  I don&#8217;t have it myself (my computers are still on XP and are not Windows 7 ready) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking to some people this morning and I recommended they upgrade any Vista Computers they have from Windows Vista to Windows 7.  To me Windows 7 is like Vista the way it was supposed to be.  I don&#8217;t have it myself (my computers are still on XP and are not Windows 7 ready) but I from what I&#8217;ve seen and heard it&#8217;s a good operating system.  So I don&#8217;t hesitate to recommend it &#8211; especially as it comes on new computers.  If I had a Vista computer I would upgrade it to Windows 7 -as it will work better and has some more features.</p>
<p>Here are some steps I would recommend to upgrade from Windows Vista to Windows 7:</p>
<ol>
<li><span id="more-500"></span>Verify your computer is ready for Windows 7 &#8211; see <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=1B544E90-7659-4BD9-9E51-2497C146AF15&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=1B544E90-7659-4BD9-9E51-2497C146AF15&amp;displaylang=en </a>for to download the upgrade adviser.</li>
<li>Backup &#8211; see <a href="http://www.anlenterprises.com/2009/11/11/backup-backup-backup-am-i-paranoid" target="_blank">http://www.anlenterprises.com/2009/11/11/backup-backup-backup-am-i-paranoid</a> for my recommendations for backup.</li>
<li>Ensure you have your disks/downloaded programs.</li>
<li>Backup (got the point yet).</li>
<li>Do a clean install of Windows 7 &#8211; there is an upgrade path but a clean install will ensure the best results &#8211; especially if you are having problems with you PC now. <a href="See http://www.winsupersite.com/win7/clean_install_upgrade_media.asp" target="_blank">See http://www.winsupersite.com/win7/clean_install_upgrade_media.asp</a> for help on performing a clean install with upgrade disks.</li>
<li>Restore your data.</li>
<li>Re-install your programs.</li>
<li>Play around with your spiffy new-like computer.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/22/recommendation-upgrade-vista-to-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

