<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A&#38;L Enterprises Tech Line &#187; iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anlenterprises.com/tag/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anlenterprises.com</link>
	<description>Andrew Explores Technology with you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://anlenterprises.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Hands on with an iPad</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/05/11/hands-on-with-an-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/05/11/hands-on-with-an-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a brief hands on experience with an Apple iPad recently &#8211; which seems to be essential to understand this new device.  I also had my wife take a look at it and play with it &#8211; as she&#8217;s not a nerd like I am &#8211; but a normal person who uses devices for their usefulness [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a brief hands on experience with an Apple iPad recently &#8211; which seems to be essential to understand this new device.  I also had my wife take a look at it and play with it &#8211; as she&#8217;s not a nerd like I am &#8211; but a normal person who uses devices for their usefulness (not just to drool over).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a beautiful device &#8211; with a good screen.  Photos look great on the thing &#8211; the process of viewing photos is also excellent.  I checked out the book application and can see how it would be enjoyable to read books on the thing &#8211; as it feels natural. </p>
<p>My wife and I also used the web browser &#8211; as we we&#8217;re looking for something on toysurus.com (Amazon) for my daughter.  My wife had a little trouble clicking just the right way (small buttons) - but the on-screen keyboard wasn&#8217;t too bad.  The home button is also useful &#8211; for if you don&#8217;t know what to do click on that and you can start over.<span id="more-745"></span></p>
<p>I tried a few other applications &#8211; but nothing took my breath away.  I did enjoy the action of flipping through the apps &#8211; as screen gestures (swiping, pinching, expanding, etc.) seem an intuitive way of interacting with a touch screen.  I found these gestures to be similar to those I use on my Palm Pre &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s because of the engineers at Palm being from Apple or just that they&#8217;re a logical concept for a touch screen.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t help comparing the iPad to my Palm Pre and one thing was obviously missing &#8211; the ability to mult-task.  I&#8217;ve never had much experience with an iPhone &#8211; but &#8220;grew&#8217; up on Palm devices.  The problem is now that I&#8217;m hooked on multi-tasking &#8211; of not having to close applications.  Maybe that&#8217;s also why I have so many tabs open in Chrome on my laptop&#8230;  Then again, the iPad wakes up much, much quicker than my laptop&#8230;.</p>
<p>I had my wife play with the iPad to see what she thought &#8211; as she&#8217;s more normal than I am.  At first she was a little unsure what do I do (again no iPhone experience).  Overall she didn&#8217;t seem to interested in the thing &#8211; but then again she&#8217;s not into new gadgets.  This is what my wife does on a computer:</p>
<ul>
<li>She edits a set of simple word documents daily and <strong>prints</strong> them (this was a break for the usage of the iPad)</li>
<li>She checks her e-mail (currently through Outlook, but I&#8217;m trying to get her to go to Gmail as I have a funky setup to have Outlook work with the same data file on multiple computers)</li>
<li>She logs into Facebook</li>
<li>She uses Quickbooks to invoice her clients (also printed) and keep here business books</li>
<li>She pays bills online</li>
<li>She does some online shopping &#8211; at various sites &#8211; which includes printing the online confirmation page</li>
</ul>
<p>This does not translate into a heavy computer user (like me who keeps getting frustrated with slowness after having multiple apps open) &#8211; but it&#8217;s more than what an iPad can do now.  She also indicated she likes the physical keyboard &#8211; which might mean a notebook could work &#8211; but except that the screens are too small for Quickbooks to be effective.</p>
<p>If the iPad was maybe $150 for an extra device I might be interested in it &#8211; to read books, quick web surfing, photos, etc.  It would be more functional than a Kindle (i.e. it can do more) and likely more ability for a rich experience.  What I would really like would be a tablet like device to read on &#8211; but would be more functional.  Have rich content, linking to web pages (in parallel to my reading &#8211; not replacing) AND would have longer battery life.   The iPad itself is a little on the heavy side to hold with one hand (I&#8217;m still thinking about those pads in Star Trek).  I can&#8217;t justify now spending money on what is more of an entertainment device (a content consumption device) vs. what is a productive device (more of creation than just consumption).  If you&#8217;re looking for something to consume content it could be a great buy &#8211; but understand what you are buying.</p>
<p>So for me the iPad is not there yet &#8211; but it captures my attention and imagination.  I did my test with my wife and right now it doesn&#8217;t make sense.  Maybe also for the fact that I can get a basic laptop (probably better than what I have now) for about as much money &#8211; which represents more value to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/05/11/hands-on-with-an-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad confusion &#8211; another technology shift?</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/04/06/ipad-confusion-another-technology-shift/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/04/06/ipad-confusion-another-technology-shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been hearing a lot about the iPad lately &#8211; but haven&#8217;t personally seen one.  I hear a lot of good things &#8211; but everyone says the experience is wonderful.  They also say you just have to hold one &#8211; which makes it difficult to evaluate from afar. It&#8217;s interesting that we reached a point [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://anlenterprises.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/iPad-Image1.jpg" rel="lightbox[697]"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-895" title="iPad Image" src="http://anlenterprises.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/iPad-Image1-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>I&#8217;ve been hearing a lot about the iPad lately &#8211; but haven&#8217;t personally seen one.  I hear a lot of good things &#8211; but everyone says the experience is wonderful.  They also say you just have to hold one &#8211; which makes it difficult to evaluate from afar. It&#8217;s interesting that we reached a point of &#8220;computers&#8221; that the &#8220;experience&#8221; is more important than the specs.  It used to be that you looked at the specs carefuly &#8211; but with even with processors today it&#8217;s hard to tell what&#8217;s faster.  Even the difference between an AMD and an Intel can be hard to predict (we have an app at work that we discovered opened 50% faster on an Intel laptop than on an AMD desktop &#8211; which still is confusing as welre not sure why&#8230;<span id="more-697"></span></p>
<p>Maybe computerare getting closer to something like a smartphone purchase.  For a phone it&#8217;s hard to write a review as the user experience is so unique &#8211; and somewhat personal.  Of course the irony of that statement is that the iPad is based on a phone OS and I wrote most of this post on my Palm Pre.</p>
<p>Have things changed that much &#8211; that it&#8217;s not about the specs &#8211; but about the experience?  Makes it hard to make recommendations &#8211; but maybe thatls what the crowd is for&#8230;</p>
<p>Some iPad review links:</p>
<p><a href="http://gear.ign.com/articles/108/1082190p1.html">http://gear.ign.com/articles/108/1082190p1.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaW_K3i7vUs">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaW_K3i7vUs</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gearlive.com/news/article/q110-ipad-review/">http://www.gearlive.com/news/article/q110-ipad-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/04/06/ipad-confusion-another-technology-shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Table features an Apple Processor?</title>
		<link>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/27/apple-table-features-an-apple-processor/</link>
		<comments>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/27/apple-table-features-an-apple-processor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anlenterprises.com/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most interesting things I&#8217;ve read today about the Apple iPad (http://www.apple.com/ipad/) was that it featured it&#8217;s own processor- the Apple A4.  This is a custom processor that runs at 1Ghz and is supposed to be very power efficient &#8211; which would be essential in a tablet.  From what I can tell a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most interesting things I&#8217;ve read today about the Apple iPad (<a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">http://www.apple.com/ipad/</a>) was that it featured it&#8217;s own processor- the Apple A4.  This is a custom processor that runs at 1Ghz and is supposed to be very power efficient &#8211; which would be essential in a tablet.  From what I can tell a consumer company creating it&#8217;s own chip is a break from trends &#8211; as even Apple switched to Intel for it&#8217;s computers.</p>
<p>Overall I was a little underwhelmed by the iPad &#8211; except for the price.  I was pleasantly surprised that it wasn&#8217;t as expensive as I thought it might be &#8211; going from $499 to $899 &#8211; based on memory and 3G capability.  This price point may actually be reasonable &#8211; considering the device essentially compares to the netbook niche.  That&#8217;s what I see this as &#8211; as Apple&#8217;s positioning between a smartphone and a laptop.  For that price you may actually get some sales &#8211; more than just Apple addicts &#8211; but for people who just want to surf the web, check their e-mail, read a book, listen to music, watch a movie &#8211; not a full computer but something easy to use.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much of an advantage their own chip has &#8211; it might depend on how much it cost &#8211; versus how much better it is than Atom or ARM based chips.  It is an interesting trend  toward power efficient processors &#8211; after the era of chips being a fire hazard.  I think that&#8217;s where windows mobile as always had a problem &#8211; as it&#8217;s not very power efficient &#8211; vs. the old Palm phone I have.  This tells you something about Apple &#8211; they made it themselves instead of using someone&#8217;s technology -because they could.  It&#8217;s something Google would do (oh wait &#8211; they made their own phone hardware and OS).  It definitely has a better cool factor than a Chrome based PC &#8211; even though those might be more functional in some core ways &#8211; but the &#8220;thinner&#8221; device seems to be in now&#8230;</p>
<p>Here are a few links related to the A4:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2010/01/27/ipad-debuts-apples-custombuilt-a4-systemonachip/">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2010/01/27/ipad-debuts-apples-custombuilt-a4-systemonachip/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10442684-64.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10442684-64.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A4">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anlenterprises.com/2010/01/27/apple-table-features-an-apple-processor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

